CO2 Mixed-Phase Fracturing Technology Application in Block G

1. Definition and Fundamental Principles

CO2 mixed-phase fracturing technology is an advanced hydraulic fracturing method in which supercritical carbon dioxide (CO2) is injected into a reservoir at pressures exceeding the critical point of CO2 (73.8 °C, 73.8 bar), combined with a limited volume of liquid carrier fluid (typically water or a surfactant-laden liquid). The term "mixed-phase" (混相) refers to the coexistence of supercritical CO2 and liquid phases within the fracture network during injection. In Block G, this technology has been deployed to stimulate tight, low-permeability reservoirs where conventional water-based fracturing fluids have proven insufficient due to formation damage mechanisms such as water blockage, clay swelling, and capillary entry pressure barriers.

The fundamental principle relies on the unique properties of supercritical CO2: extremely low viscosity (approximately 0.06–0.10 cP, roughly one-tenth that of water), high diffusivity, and the ability to dissolve and transport hydrocarbons. During injection, supercritical CO2 penetrates micro-fractures and pore throats that water cannot access. Upon fracture closure or pressure release, CO2 undergoes phase transition back to gas, generating a secondary "bounce-back" pressure that propels fines and debris away from the wellbore, thereby enhancing fracture conductivity and minimizing residual fluid damage.

In the context of Block G operations, the mixed-phase approach is particularly advantageous because the reservoir fluids are hydrocarbon-rich, allowing CO2 to mix with and dissolve into the formation oil, reducing interfacial tension and facilitating oil mobilization. This creates a synergistic combination of mechanical fracture creation and chemical reservoir stimulation.

2. Category and Business Positioning

From the perspective of Cladding Technology Shanxi Co., Ltd., CO2 mixed-phase fracturing technology falls within the downstream oilfield equipment and materials supply business segment. The company's role in this technology chain is not as the fracturing service provider itself, but as the critical materials and component supplier that enables safe, reliable, and corrosion-resistant execution of CO2 fracturing operations. Specifically, the company's involvement encompasses:

This positioning places the company at a strategic intersection: understanding the fracturing technology's material demands allows the company to develop targeted product specifications, qualify new material combinations, and build technical credibility with oilfield operators.

3. Technical Purpose and Value

3.1 Reservoir Stimulation Objectives

In Block G, the primary objectives of CO2 mixed-phase fracturing include:

3.2 Value to Cladding Technology Shanxi Co., Ltd.

For the company, engagement with CO2 mixed-phase fracturing projects delivers multi-dimensional value:

4. Key Process and Implementation Points

4.1 CO2 Mixed-Phase Fracturing Process Flow

  1. Pre-fracturing preparation: Wellbore cleaning, pressure testing, and confirmation of casing integrity (critical for CO2 corrosion resistance verification).
  2. Fluid blending: Supercritical CO2 is blended with a controlled ratio of liquid carrier (typically 5–20 vol% liquid) at the wellhead or injection site using specialized mixing manifolds.
  3. Injection phase: The mixed-phase fluid is pumped at rates of 5–30 bpm (barrels per minute) at pressures typically ranging from 150–350 MPa, depending on formation closure pressure and target fracture geometry.
  4. Proppant placement: Proppant (typically 20/40 or 30/50 mesh ceramic or sand) is injected in stages, carried by the low-viscosity CO2 phase.
  5. Shut-in and phase transition: Upon cessation of injection, CO2 transitions from supercritical to gas phase, generating secondary fracture extension and debris removal.
  6. Flowback and production: Dissolved CO2 and mobilized hydrocarbons are produced to surface, with CO2 potentially recycled for EOR or captured for storage.

4.2 Critical Material and Equipment Requirements

Component Material Requirement Typical Cladding Solution Key Performance Criteria
Casing and tubing CO2 corrosion resistance in wet environments CS base with duplex SS 2205 or Inconel 625 overlay (1–3 mm) Corrosion rate < 0.025 mm/y per NACE MR0175/ISO 15156
Injection pump internals Wear and corrosion resistance under high-pressure CO2 CS base with Stellite 6 or Inconel 625 weld overlay (2–5 mm) Hardness ≥ 40 HRC; erosion resistance in CO2/H2S environment
Pressure vessels and manifolds Mechanical integrity at 350+ MPa with CO2 exposure CS plate with 309L/316L transition + duplex overlay ASME Section VIII Div. 1/2 compliance; impact testing per ASTM A370
Valve bodies and trim Sealing integrity under CO2 phase transitions Stainless steel base with Inconel 625 overlay on sealing surfaces API 6D/6A compliance; leak rate < 1×10⁻⁶ cc/s
Surface piping and spools Atmospheric and CO2 corrosion resistance CS pipe with 304L or 316L single-layer cladding (1.5 mm) ASTM A270/A268 cladding specification; NACE MR0175 compliance

4.3 Key Process Parameters for Cladding Operations Supporting CO2 Fracturing Equipment

Parameter Typical Range Rationale
Base material preheat 150–250 °C Reduce residual stress in CS substrate; prevent cold cracking
Interpass temperature ≤ 250 °C Limit grain growth and HAZ hardening
Welding current (GTAW) 120–250 A Control penetration depth for thin overlay layers
Welding speed (GTAW) 40–80 mm/min Ensure adequate dilution control (target dilution < 20%)
Back purge Argon, ≥ 5 L/min Prevent oxidation of overlay alloy; critical for Ni-based alloys
Post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) 590–650 °C for 2–4 hours (for duplex SS) Solution treatment to restore phase balance (α/γ ≈ 50/50)
Dilution control target ≤ 20% for Ni-based; ≤ 15% for duplex SS Ensure overlay corrosion resistance meets specification

4.4 Implementation Challenges Specific to Block G

5. Applicable Standards and Acceptance Criteria

5.1 Material and Welding Standards

5.2 Corrosion and Environmental Standards

5.3 Non-Destructive Testing and Acceptance

NDT Method Application Acceptance Criteria
Penetrant Testing (PT) per ASTM E165 Detection of surface cracks in overlay welds No linear indications; round indications ≤ 3 mm
Magnetic Particle Testing (MT) per ASTM E709 Surface and near-surface defects in ferromagnetic overlays No linear indications; round indications ≤ 3 mm
Ultrasonic Testing (UT) per ASTM E2588/E2694 Weld through-thickness inspection; dilution measurement No Type II indications; bond quality per ASTM E2785
Hardness Testing per ASTM E18/E10 Verification of overlay and HAZ hardness compliance Overlay ≤ 35 HRC (for NACE MR0175 sour service); HAZ ≤ 250 HV
Dilution Testing (spectrochemical analysis) Quantification of base metal dilution into overlay ≤ 20% dilution for Ni-based; ≤ 15% for duplex SS
Macrographic examination per ASTM A270 Verification of clad layer thickness, uniformity, and absence of inclusions Full bond across entire clad surface; no inclusions, cracks, or laps

5.4 Performance Qualification Testing

6. Common Risks and Controls

6.1 Technical Risks in CO2 Mixed-Phase Fracturing Equipment

Risk Category Specific Risk Impact Mitigation/Control Measures
Corrosion Carbonic acid corrosion of CS base through overlay defects Casing failure; wellbore integrity loss Full NDT coverage; dilution control; NACE MR0103 compliance verification
Mechanical Clad interface delamination under cyclic pressure loading Sudden loss of corrosion barrier; catastrophic failure UT bond testing (ASTM E2785); controlled PWHT; fracture toughness qualification
Material Sigma phase formation in duplex SS overlays after prolonged service Loss of toughness and corrosion resistance Limit PWHT temperature to ≤ 650 °C; periodic metallurgical inspection; service life monitoring
Thermal Thermal shock cracking during CO2 Joule-Thomson expansion Crack initiation at overlay/HAZ interface Low-temperature impact testing; selection of high-toughness overlay alloys; avoidance of high-carbon transition layers
Erosion Proppant erosion of overlay surface in high-velocity zones Exposure of base metal; accelerated corrosion Selection of erosion-resistant alloys (Stellite 6, hardfacing); overlay thickness ≥ 3 mm in high-erosion zones
Manufacturing Incomplete fusion at clad interface during TIG/MIG overlay Hidden defect; undetectable by surface NDT WPS qualification with UT verification; operator certification; 100% PT/MT of finished surfaces

6.2 Quality Control Framework

A robust quality control framework for CO2 fracturing equipment cladding must include:

7. Application Scenarios Across Company Technology Routes

7.1 TIG/MIG Weld Overlay Route

The TIG (GTAW) and MIG (GMAW) weld overlay route is the primary method for applying corrosion-resistant cladding to CO2 fracturing equipment components. Key applications include:

Process advantages for CO2 fracturing applications: TIG/MIG overlay offers excellent dilution control (achievable dilution as low as 5–10% with proper technique), precise thickness control, and the ability to work in tight geometries. For Block G applications, the ability to produce smooth, defect-free overlay surfaces is critical because surface roughness can initiate corrosion pitting in CO2 environments.

7.2 Hydraulic Explosive Bonding Route

Hydraulic explosive bonding (also known as water-jet assisted explosive cladding) is applicable to larger components where CO2 fracturing equipment requires substantial clad surfaces. Key applications include:

Process advantages for CO2 fracturing applications: The hydraulic explosive bonding process produces clad plate with superior bond strength (typically exceeding the base metal strength) and excellent resistance to thermal cycling. This is particularly valuable for CO2 fracturing applications where temperature fluctuations from the Joule-Thomson effect can be severe. The process also eliminates the dilution concerns inherent in welding-based cladding, ensuring full alloy chemistry in the cladding layer.

7.3 Explosion Welding Route

Explosion welding (explosive cladding) is the traditional and most proven method for producing large-format clad plate for pressure equipment. Key applications include:

Process advantages for CO2 fracturing applications: Explosion welding produces a metallurgical bond with a characteristic wave pattern that provides excellent fatigue resistance—a critical property for components subjected to the cyclic pressure loading inherent in fracturing operations. The process also allows cladding of materials with large melting point differences (e.g., aluminum on steel, or titanium on steel) that are not feasible by welding methods. For CO2 fracturing, explosion welding is particularly suitable for components requiring thick cladding layers (≥ 5 mm) where weld dilution would compromise overlay alloy properties.

7.4 Technology Route Selection Matrix for CO2 Fracturing Applications

Component Type Preferred Route Rationale Typical Clad Material
Production tubing (small diameter) TIG Weld Overlay Precision control; suitable for thin walls; in-situ application possible Inconel 625 or Duplex SS 2205, 1.5–3 mm
Large manifold plates Hydraulic Explosive Bonding Large area coverage; low distortion; no dilution Duplex SS 2205 or Inconel 625, 2–5 mm
Pressure vessel shells (thick) Explosion Welding Thick cladding achievable; superior fatigue resistance; large format Duplex SS 2205 or 316L, 3–10 mm
Valve internals TIG/MIG Weld Overlay Complex geometry; precise thickness control; repair capability Stellite 6 or Inconel 625, 2–5 mm
Surface piping spools Explosion Welding or Hydraulic Bonding Full circumference coverage; no dilution; production efficiency 304L or 316L, 1.5–3 mm
Heat exchanger tubes TIG Weld Overlay Interior access; thin wall compatibility; precision Duplex SS 2205, 1–2 mm

8. Contribution to Qualification Building, Product Delivery, and Customer Value

8.1 Qualification Building

The CO2 mixed-phase fracturing technology learning and application in Block G directly contributes to the company's qualification portfolio in several ways:

8.2 Product Delivery Enhancement

8.3 Customer Value Creation

8.4 Strategic Implications for the Company

The CO2 mixed-phase fracturing technology application in Block G represents more than a single project opportunity. It signals the company's entry into the rapidly growing EOR and CCS markets, where demand for corrosion-resistant clad materials is projected to increase significantly as oil and gas operators seek to maximize recovery from mature fields and comply with carbon emission regulations. The learning reflection document (学习心得) serves as the foundation for a systematic knowledge management process that ensures technical understanding is captured, disseminated, and continuously improved across the organization.

By building expertise in this technology domain, the company establishes a competitive moat that is difficult for new entrants to replicate. The combination of qualified WPS/PQR records, certified operators, validated material test data, and proven field performance creates a cumulative advantage that strengthens the company's market position in the oil and gas cladding segment.

9. Conclusion

The CO2 mixed-phase fracturing technology application in Block G represents a significant technical and commercial opportunity for Cladding Technology Shanxi Co., Ltd. The technology demands high-performance clad materials and components that meet stringent corrosion, mechanical, and environmental requirements governed by standards including NACE MR0175/ISO 15156, NACE MR0103/ISO 526, ASTM A270, ASME Section VIII, and API 5CT. The company's multi-route cladding capability—spanning TIG/MIG weld overlay for precision applications, hydraulic explosive bonding for large-format low-distortion production, and explosion welding for thick-section fatigue-resistant cladding—provides comprehensive coverage of the material requirements across the CO2 fracturing equipment chain.

Through systematic qualification building, rigorous quality control, and deep technical understanding, the company can deliver reliable, compliant, and cost-optimized clad components that enable safe and efficient CO2 fracturing operations. The institutional knowledge captured through this learning exercise provides a foundation for continuous improvement and market expansion into the broader EOR and CCS technology ecosystem.